On September 29, 2025, Chile’s Supreme Court issued a decisive ruling directing six prominent internet service providers—Claro, Entel, GTD, Telefónica, WOM, and VTR—to immediately block access to unauthorized online sports betting and gambling sites. This landmark decision underscores the judiciary’s firm interpretation of the nation’s gambling laws, emphasizing the exclusive rights of licensed operators such as Lotería de Concepción. The ruling marks a significant shift in the regulatory landscape of Chile’s iGaming industry, reinforcing the boundaries between legal and illegal gaming operations.
The case originated from a legal action initiated by Lotería de Concepción against the aforementioned internet providers. Lotería contended that the proliferation of illegal gambling websites severely undermined its exclusive operational rights and contravened Chilean legal statutes. Initially, in May 2025, the Court of Appeals of Santiago rejected Lotería’s appeal, siding with the internet providers. However, the Supreme Court’s Third Chamber overturned this decision, recognizing the legitimacy of Lotería’s concerns and ordering the blockage of illegal online gaming websites.
According to the Supreme Court, games of chance are inherently illegal in Chile unless explicitly licensed. The court clarified that only specific entities, namely Lotería de Concepción, Polla Chilena, authorized racetracks, and licensed casinos, possess the legal authority to conduct gambling activities. Furthermore, the court declared that within the online gaming sector, only Lotería, Polla, and Teletrak are entitled to offer particular games. Consequently, all other sites were deemed illegal, necessitating internet providers to block access to them.
A pivotal element of the ruling addressed the issue of net neutrality. While internet providers are typically not permitted to restrict access to lawful content, the court reasoned that blocking illegal content, such as unlicensed gambling sites, falls within their mandate. Failure to comply with this directive was deemed arbitrary and unlawful, particularly as it infringed upon Lotería de Concepción’s exclusive property rights concerning its gambling concession.
The decision was not unanimous, reflecting ongoing debates about regulation and internet freedom. Justice Mireya López and Attorney Carlos Urquieta dissented, supporting the lower court’s initial dismissal of Lotería’s petition. They raised concerns about the implications of stringent regulation and the extent of restrictions placed on internet service providers, pointing out potential conflicts with broader principles of internet freedom.
Despite the dissent, the majority ruling sets a precedent, reinforcing the rights of state-authorized gambling operators and constraining the operations of unauthorized digital platforms. This decision signals the government’s commitment to protecting licensed operators, enhancing consumer safeguards, and preserving state revenues from the burgeoning online gambling sector.
The ruling was supported by evidence and reports from the Superintendencia de Casinos de Juego and the Undersecretariat of Telecommunications (Subtel), which advocated for stricter control over unlicensed gambling websites. Furthermore, Polla Chilena, another licensed gambling operator, joined Lotería de Concepción in urging the court to adopt more rigorous measures against illegal operators.
The implications of this decision for the gambling industry are profound. It represents a pivotal moment in Chile’s regulatory approach to internet gambling, highlighting the importance of safeguarding licensed operators and limiting unauthorized sites that jeopardize consumer protection and state income.
For internet service providers, the ruling introduces a new legal requirement to enforce content controls related to gambling, which will be closely monitored by regulatory bodies and may influence future digital content management cases. For players, the ruling restricts access to numerous international gambling websites while enhancing the legitimacy and security of services provided by licensed operators like Lotería de Concepción and Polla Chilena.
In ordering ISPs to block illegal online gambling websites, the Supreme Court contributes to Chile’s broader efforts to reclaim control over its online gambling industry. By reinforcing the exclusive authority of licensed providers and holding internet service providers accountable for enforcing these prohibitions, the ruling aims to uphold the integrity of the iGaming sector and ensure consumer protection.
While the ruling is a significant step in regulating Chile’s gambling market, the presence of dissenting opinions within the court highlights ongoing debates around internet regulation and governance. Nevertheless, this decision is a crucial milestone in Chile’s journey towards order and regulation in its gambling industry, setting a new standard for handling similar cases in the future.
Erik Agary is a seasoned writer at True Games Reviews, specializing in gaming, casino games, and interactive entertainment. With a passion for all things digital, Erik dives deep into the latest trends and developments in the gaming world, offering insightful reviews and detailed analysis. His expertise spans across multiple gaming platforms, ensuring comprehensive coverage that resonates with both novice and experienced gamers alike.
4.1/5Disco Win Casino
NDB: 15 Euros
