In a decisive move, Romania’s National Office for Gambling (ONJN) has blacklisted Polymarket, a popular blockchain-based prediction and event trading platform, following a dramatic increase in unlicensed betting activities during the recent elections. The ONJN reported that during the presidential elections alone, Polymarket handled transactions exceeding $600 million, with an additional $15 million traded during Bucharest’s local elections. These figures, while reflecting cumulative trading volumes rather than individual bets, highlight the substantial scale of unregulated betting outside the purview of Romania’s state oversight.
The ONJN asserts that Polymarket qualifies as a counterparty betting operator under Romanian laws, despite its self-description as an “event-trading” or “prediction” platform. The platform facilitates wagering on future events in various markets and charges commissions on transactions, both of which necessitate a valid Romanian gambling license. The regulator stressed that unlicensed operations not only compromise player protection and anti-money laundering (AML) measures but also violate Romania’s legal monopoly framework on gambling activities. This situation, the Office declared, sets a troubling precedent if such counterparty betting is misclassified as mere trading.
In its advisory, the ONJN warned users that participating in or promoting unlicensed gambling is a misdemeanor under Romania’s Government Emergency Ordinance 77/2009, carrying possible fines for both users and promoters. This robust stance is seen as part of broader EU efforts to regulate event trading as a form of gambling requiring appropriate licensing.
Romania’s action aligns with similar measures taken by Belgium, France, and Poland against Polymarket. France’s Autorité Nationale des Jeux (ANJ) initiated investigations in 2024 after a French user placed a €30 million bet on the U.S. presidential election using the platform, which resulted in a geo-block on French accounts. Similarly, Poland’s Ministry of Finance added the platform to its Register of Illegal Gambling Domains, enforcing restrictions on internet service providers and payment systems. Belgium’s Kansspelcommissie (KSC) imposed a blacklist on Polymarket in January 2025, citing multiple breaches of national gambling laws.
This collective enforcement across Europe underscores a shared regulatory viewpoint: prediction markets are considered gambling if users stake monetary value on uncertain outcomes, regardless of whether settled in fiat currency or via blockchain technology. This consensus is increasingly putting pressure on platforms like Polymarket to align with European gambling laws.
Despite its global expansion ambitions, Polymarket remains unlicensed within the EU and the European Economic Area. The platform faced significant hurdles in the United States too, where it was sanctioned by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and compelled to limit access for American users. CEO Shayne Coplan expressed intentions to expand within regulated frameworks, as seen in Polymarket’s $112 million purchase of QCEX, a CFTC-licensed exchange platform. However, within Europe, the platform continues to operate without authorization, facing escalating scrutiny from regulators.
Polymarket’s struggles are emblematic of the broader challenges facing blockchain-based prediction markets, as they navigate the complex regulatory landscapes of different jurisdictions. The EU’s stance is increasingly definitive — event trading constitutes gambling and must be regulated as such. While proponents of platforms like Polymarket argue that they represent a new frontier in decentralized finance, offering innovative ways to predict and hedge against future events, regulators remain steadfast in their approach. They stress the necessity of stringent oversight to protect consumers and ensure market integrity.
Critics of the ban argue that such regulatory measures stifle innovation and limit consumer choice by not recognizing the potential of blockchain technology to provide transparency and reduce fraud. They suggest that instead of outright bans, a more nuanced approach could involve creating specialized regulatory frameworks that acknowledge the unique aspects of blockchain-based trading.
However, regulators counter that the primary concern is the protection of users and the prevention of potential misuse for illicit activities such as money laundering. They argue that without proper oversight, these platforms could easily become conduits for financial crimes, undermining the integrity of financial systems.
The tension between innovation in blockchain technologies and stricter regulatory controls continues to shape the discourse around event trading platforms. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how platforms like Polymarket will adapt to the evolving regulatory environment while trying to maintain their innovative edge. The ongoing developments will likely set precedents for how similar platforms operate in the future, with significant implications for both the igaming industry and regulatory bodies across the globe.
Sarah Thompson is a seasoned writer specializing in casino gaming and online gambling. With over a decade of experience in the industry, Sarah brings in-depth knowledge and a keen eye for detail to her work at CasinoNoDeposits.com. Her expertise lies in uncovering the latest no deposit bonuses and providing comprehensive reviews of online casinos. Passionate about helping players maximize their gaming experience, Sarah combines her analytical skills with a flair for engaging storytelling.
3.9/5ViciWin Casino
20 Free Spins
